Saxholm AS v. Dynal, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSS, District Judge:
I have received the attached Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned matter from United States Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky, dated June 10, 1996. Having received no objections to Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky’s report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and having conducted a de novo review of the record, I hereby adopt the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the court. Accordingly,. plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint is GRANTED, and defendants’ application for sanctions is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
POHORELSKY, United…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Farid v. BoueyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- Oneida Indian Nation of New York State v. County of OneidaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- Cerni v. J.P. Morgan Securities LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Ruggles v. WellPoint, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Amaya v. Roadhouse Brick Oven Pizza, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.