Legal Opinion
Acme Printing Ink Co. v. Menard, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 28, 1995No. 89-C-834PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WARREN, Senior District Judge.
Now before the Court is plaintiff Inx International Ink Co. Inc.’s (“Inx”) 1 motion for leave to amend its complaint. For the following reasons, this motion will be granted, except to the extent that it seeks to add claims under section 6972(a)(1)(A) of the Resource Conservation Recovery Act (“RCRA”).
I. BACKGROUND
The full factual background of this complex multi-party environmental litigation has been fully discussed in prior opinions of this Court, see Decision and Order of December 5, 1994; Acme Printing Ink Co. v. Menard, Inc., 812 F.Supp.…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Glazer v. American Ecology Environmental Services Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1995
- Prisco v. State of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- A-C Reorganization Trust v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
- Taylor v. ChaterDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
- United States v. Atlas Lederer Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.