Legal Opinion
Portlance v. Golden Valley State Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 8, 1987No. CX-86-1315PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
Golden Valley State Bank appeals from the order denying its motion for summary judgment and certifying the following question as important and doubtful:
Does the two-year limitations period of Minn.Stat. 541.07(5) or the six-year limitations period of Minn.Stat. 541.05, subd. 1(1) govern in a Pine River wrongful discharge case?
On March 26, 1981, Jack Portlance, an assistant vice president and loan officer, was summarily discharged after almost 10 years of service with the bank. Almost three years later, on or about February 10, 1984, Portlance instituted this action alleging…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Roaderick v. Lull Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Zeller v. Prior Lake Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- H. KOHOUT v. Shakopee Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Harold E. ADAMSON, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARMCO, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Levin v. C.O.M.B. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- James M. Kulinski v. Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc., James M. Kulinski v. Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- McDaniel v. United Hardware Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.