Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Love v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 16, 1914No. 6019PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Brror from District Court, Kingfisher County; James W. Steen, Judge. Application by the State, on the relation of Charles A. Love, for writ of mandamus against Clyde Smith. Judgment for respondent, and relator brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

RIDDLE, J..Plaintiff in error, Chas. A. Love, filed his motion and affidavit in the district court of Kingfisher county, praying for a peremptory writ of mandamus. In substance he alleges that at the general election held November 5, 1912, he was the regular qualified nominee of the Democratic party for the office of sheriff of Kingfisher county; that at said election he received a plurality of votes cast for the office of sheriff; that the county election board of said county issued to him a certificate of election to said office; that he has duly qualified and has taken the oath of office,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cameron, Superintendent v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  2. Matney v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Kerr v. TregoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  4. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  5. Ellis v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bynum v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Rasure v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Elliott v. State Ex Rel. Kirk-PatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. McKye v. STATE ELECTION BD. OF STATESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Dent v. McLennanWashington Supreme Court · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API