Legal Opinion

Bynum v. Strain

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1923No. 14570PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This was a suit by Joe H. Strain, acting Bank Commissioner of the state, to enjoin E. T. Bynum from interfering with the affairs of his office.

The cause of action was primarily based upon the following alleged fac^s, to vvit: - That plaintiff, Joe H. Strain, was, on the date named, the duly qualified and acting Bank Commissioner of the state, under regular appointment of the Governor; that while thus acting, the Governor, by executive order, attempted to remove him from office, and on or about the same date appointed defendant, E. T. Bynum, to said office ; that said purported order of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stone v. CaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Cameron, Superintendent v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  3. Ewing v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  4. West v. MadanskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. State Ex Rel. Love v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Wentz v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Rouse v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. State v. BarnettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Wenner v. MotherseadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Choctaw Pressed Brick Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API