Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dent v. McLennan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1920No. 15391PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Whatcom county, Pemberton, J., entered January 31, 1919, in favor of the plaintiff, in mandamus proceedings to require issuance of a certificate of election, after a trial to. the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

At a municipal election in the second ward of the city of Bellingham for the office of councilman, George B. Dent and John M. Odell were candi*17dates. There were some irregularities in the returns made by the officers of precinct number thirty-two. If the returns of that precinct be counted, then Odell received more votes than did Dent; but if those returns be not counted, then Dent was elected. Dent was already a councilman from the ward in question and was seeking re-election.

The charter of the city of Bellingham provides that, at its first meeting following an election, the city council…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brown v. McQuadeWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hoy v. State, ex rel. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. State ex rel. McReavy v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Kimball v. OlmstedWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State Ex Rel. Love v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Green Mountain School District No. 103 v. DurkeeWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Manlove v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State ex rel. Forstell v. OtisWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. GREEN MT. SCH. DIST. v. DurkeeWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Clarken v. BlomstromWashington Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API