Legal Opinion
Matney v. King
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 9, 1908No. 6PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETITION.
"Comes now the plaintiff, Toney Matney, and represents and shows to this court that at the general election held in the state of Oklahoma on the 17th day of September, 1907, he was duly and legally elected to the office of district clerk of the county of Muskogee, state of Oklahoma, having received a majority of the votes of said county cast at said election for said office, and that he has since received his certificate of election from the clerk of said county, and has taken the oath of office and given the bond as required by law; that on the 30th day of October, 1907, in a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson Ex Dem. Astor v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Cameron, Superintendent v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
- Sikes v. RansomNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- In Re DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- State v. Mayor of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- LCR, INC. v. Linwood PropertiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Rasure v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- State Ex Rel. Comstock v. HempsteadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- North Side State Bank v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Campbell v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1917
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.