Legal Opinion

Normann v. Schmidt

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 2, 1942No. 4556PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeNeoot, Judge

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellee with respect to the four counts of the interference. Count 1 is illustrative and reads as follows:

1. The process of preparing alcohols comprising subjecting a higher aliphatic carboxylic acid having more than five carbon atoms to a high temperature and pressure adapted to reduce acids to alcohols in the presence of hydrogen and a hydrogenating catalyst until reduction of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Stainless Steel Co. v. Rustless Iron Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1933
  2. Woburn Degreasing Co. v. Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1941
  3. Handley Page, Ltd. v. Leech Aircraft, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of SmythCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. In Re NattaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1967
  3. In re NormannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  4. Durdin v. NordellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  5. Hogan v. ZletzDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API