Legal Opinion

In re Normann

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 3, 1945No. 5016PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims (Nos. 1, 2, 7, 14 to 17, inclusive, 20, 25, and 27) in appellants’ application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to the production of higher aliphatic alcohols.

Claims 1, 2,17, 20, and 27 are sufficiently illustrative of the appealed claims. They read:

1. The process of preparing alcohols comprising reducing a fresh higher aliphatic carboxylic acid having more than five carbon atoms by subjecting the same to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re JannellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  2. Normann v. SchmidtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  3. In re DayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re AllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  2. Application of Basil Vivian Aller, Richard Norman Lacey, Reginald Harold HallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  3. In re McKellinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API