Legal Opinion

Durdin v. Nordell

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 26, 1951No. 5809PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This case is before us on an appeal from a decision of the Board of Interference Examiners holding that the counts in issue are readable on the original disclosure of the appellee and awarding priority of invention to him.

On November 28, 1947, appellee Nordell filed an application for reissue of Patent No. 2,418,189,. “Traction Drive for Liquid Treating Apparatus,” issued April 1, 1947, and applied for August 23, 1941. The disclosure of the Nordell reissue application is identical with that of the original patent and the claims differ only in that two have been added which were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Deibel v. Heise & SchumacherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. Martin v. FriendlyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  3. Sweetland v. ColeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. Holdsworth v. GoldsmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  5. Field v. StowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fontijn v. OkamotoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  2. Stansbury v. BondCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API