Legal Opinion
Hogan v. Zletz
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 1, 1967No. Misc. No. 35PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAYTON, District Judge.
This opinion supplements those of September 26, 1966, and October 19, 1966, reported at 259 F.Supp. 922, in which it was decided that a United States District Court had the power, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 24, to order production of documents under Rule 34 of the Rules of Civil Procedure in litigation pending before the Patent Office. The purpose of this opinion is to define the scope of discovery.1
Some repetition of what was said in 259 F.Supp. 922 is necessary. This is a motion for production under Rule 34 F.R.Civ.P. ancillary to a four-party patent interference…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Agawam Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954
- Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Georgia-Pacific Plywood Co. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re NattaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1967