Legal Opinion

Ferrell v. Vic Tanny International, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1984No. Docket 69667-69669PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the trial court’s granting of defendant’s motions for summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiffs have individually failed to state claims upon which relief could be granted, GCR 1963, 117.2(1). These cases have been consolidated on appeal on this Court’s own motion.

Plaintiffs challenge the propriety of defendant’s rules and regulations adopted after they became members of defendant’s club, specifying the color of the apparel permitted to be worn by members at one of defendant’s clubs. Specifically, plaintiffs question whether the defendant, Vic Tanny…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ledsinger v. BurmeisterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Burkhardt v. City National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Pauley v. HallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Goldman v. Loubella ExtendablesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation Chevrolet Motor Division v. The New A.C. Chevrolet, Inc. Dba the New A.C. ChevroletCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Hubbard Chevrolet Company, Cross-Appellant v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. Burton v. William Beaumont HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  4. Appalachian Railcar Services, Inc. v. Boatright Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  5. James v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API