Goldman v. Loubella Extendables

In this antitrust action plaintiff, a clothing retailer, has alleged that defendant, a clothing manufacturer, conspired or combined with plaintiffs competitors to restrict trade by stopping sales of defendant’s merchandise to plaintiff because plaintiff was selling the merchandise at a discount. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the theory that plaintiff was unable to present any evidence of conspiracy. GCR 1963, 117.2(3). Plaintiff appeals and we reverse.

Defendant’s vice president in charge of sales submitted an affidavit in support of the motion for summary…