Ledsinger v. Burmeister
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtN. J. Kaufman, P.J.
Plaintiffs, Harold and Shirley Ledsinger, appeal as of right from the dismissal of their cause of action by way of summary judgment under GCR 1963, 117.2(1).
The facts as alleged in plaintiffs’ second amended complaint are not complex. Harold and Shirley Ledsinger are a black husband and wife residing in Pontiac. Defendant is a retail merchant doing business in Troy. On April 25, 1980, at defendant’s place of business, Harold Ledsinger entered into an agreement with defendant to purchase certain auto parts. At that time, Mr. Led-singer made a down payment of $100. When Led-singer returned to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Crowther v. Ross Chemical and Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Taylor v. MetzgerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Garretson v. City of Madison HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Doe v. MillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Rambo v. CohenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- David K. Pratt and Teri D. Pratt v. Brown MacHine Company, a Division of John Brown, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.