Legal Opinion

Burkhardt v. City National Bank

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1975No. Docket 14699PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The plaintiffs are making monthly mortgage loan payments to the defendant bank. Included in the mortgage contract are paragraphs requiring monthly payments into an escrow account to enable the bank to pay, once a year when they become due, the city and county taxes and the insurance premiums. The proofs showed that the bank did not attempt to predict increases in those expenses. Instead, it utilized an accounting method treating the three expenses separately and requiring the mortgagor to pay into the account each month a sum equal to 1/12 the amount last paid for insurance plus 1/12 of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. GroomesMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Klever v. KleverMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Cooke Contracting Co. v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation Chevrolet Motor Division v. The New A.C. Chevrolet, Inc. Dba the New A.C. ChevroletCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Hubbard Chevrolet Company, Cross-Appellant v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. Karen Stephenson v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Kevin R. Cook and K. Cook Enterprises, Inc. v. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Ferrell v. Vic Tanny International, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API