Legal Opinion
James v. Whirlpool Corp.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided October 26, 1992No. 90-2115-C-5PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
806 F.Supp. 835 (1992)
Joseph JAMES, Darrell Woods, and St. Louis Appliance Parts, Inc., a corporation, Plaintiffs,
v.
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a corporation, Defendant.
No. 90-2115-C-5.
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.
October 26, 1992.
James Brandenburg, Brandeburg, Kaveney & Lownsdale, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs.
Daniel T. Rabbit, Rabbitt, Pitzer & Snodgrass, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LIMBAUGH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, former distributors of Whirlpool appliance parts, filed this action against Whirlpool Corporation claiming 1) breach of contract, 2)…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jerome-Duncan, Inc. v. Auto-By-Tel, L.L.C., Auto-By-Tel Marketing Corporation, and North Brothers Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Karen Stephenson v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Hamade v. Sunoco, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Donald W. Geib, D/B/A Rochester Colonial Amoco v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Watkins & Son Pet Supplies v. Iams Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.