State Bank of Chilton v. Citizens Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The principal contention made and argued here is that the election of the defendant to rebuild the barn operated to make a new contract by virtue of which the defendant might discharge its liability under its policy by rebuilding the barn. On behalf of the defendant it is claimed that this option or right to elect is conclusive not only upon the owner of the property but upon the mortgagee under the subrogation clause. By sec. 203.06, Wis. Stats., fire insurance companies are prohibited from issuing or delivering policies which do not conform to the standard policy with certain exceptions…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Savarese v. Ohio Farmers Insurance Co. of LeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Beals v. . the Home Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Temple v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Globe & Rutgers Ins. Co. of New York v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Curo v. Citizens Fund Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Polar Manufacturing Co. v. Integrity Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Abbottsford Building & Loan Ass'n v. William Penn Fire Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Cameron v. Virginia Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Gowan v. Homestead Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Abbottsford B. & L. Ass'n v. William Penn Fire Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1935