Legal Opinion

Temple v. Niagara Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1901PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dunn county: E. W. Helms, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Cassoday, 0. J.

It appears from the record, and is undisputed, that prior to January 15, 1900, the plaintiff was the owner of a two-story frame hotel building situated in the village of Knapp, and had procured thereon, and then held, seven policies of insurance, each insuring him against all direct loss or damage by fire to said building, to the amount *373stated in such policies, respectively, issued by the several defendants herein, together aggregating the suui of $6,000, which policies were each and all in the form of the Wisconsin standard fire insurance policy, as established by secs.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Royal Insurance Co. of Liverpool, EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Oshkosh Gas Light Co. v. Germania Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Reilly v. Franklin Insurance Co. of St. LouisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Seyk v. Millers' National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Bourgeois v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gratz v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Rosenthal v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Horn v. Atlas Assurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Keith v. Royal Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Williams v. Travelers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API