Legal Opinion

Curo v. Citizens Fund Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 1932No. 28,844PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

September 6, 1927, defendant insured plaintiff’s dwelling under a valued policy, in the Minnesota standard form. The insurable value of the dwelling was fixed at $4,000, and it was insured for that sum. An additional $500 of insurance on contents is not involved. August 7, 1931, during the term of the policy, the dwelling was totally destroyed by fire. Defendant claimed the policy right to rebuild and gave timely notice of its election to do so. Plaintiff, insisting it was her right to take the full insurance in money, commenced this action for a permanent injunction restraining defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Temple v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Fadanelli v. National Security Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. GLM Partnership v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Cussler v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. A. H. Jacobson Co. v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1949
  4. Langhorne v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2006
  5. State Bank of Chilton v. Citizens Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API