Legal Opinion
Polar Manufacturing Co. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1959PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
Upon this appeal the defendant contends that the special verdict and the court’s instructions were erroneous. This involves a construction of sec. 209.06 (1), Stats. 1955, which reads as follows:
“No oral or written statement, representation, or warranty made by the insured or in his behalf in the negotiation of a contract of insurance shall be deemed material or defeat or avoid the policy, unless such statement, representation, or warranty was false and made with intent to deceive, or unless the matter misrepresented or made a warranty increased the risk or contributed to the loss.”
The trial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Olson v. Herman Farmers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Bank of Cashton v. La Crosse County Scandinavian Town Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- State Bank of Chilton v. Citizens Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Paris Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by13 opinions
- Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Bade v. Badger Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Stockinger v. Central National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Doelger & Kirsten, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Ensz v. Brown Insurance AgencyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.