Nobles v. Bank of Eclectic
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The appeal here is by the defendant from the order of the trial court granting plaintiff a new trial. The suit as originally commenced was one by the payee of a promissory note against the maker and an indorser. After demurrer sustained to the complaint, it was amended by striking the name of the maker as a party defendant, and the case proceeded to judgment in favor of the other defendant.
The several defenses presented by the defendant under the general issue, pleaded in short by consent with leave, were payment, no consideration, illegal consideration, and novation, and on some of these…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Keel v. LarkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Day v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Smith v. Tombigbee & Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- J. F. Morgan Paving Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Citizens' Bk. of Wind Gap v. LipschitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Bynum v. Southern Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Green v. NaborsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Wainwright v. AndertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Holczstein v. Bessemer Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.