Legal Opinion

Holczstein v. Bessemer Trust & Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1931No. 6 Div. 778Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

BROWN, J.

The first question presented in appellants’ application for rehearing relates to the sufficiency of their plea 7—a plea of confession and avoidance—which not only in legal effect confesses the averments of the complaint declaring against defendants as joint makers, but in terms alleges “while on the face of the note sued on this defendant signed said note, he did so as a mere indorser, and not otherwise, and with the understanding between him and the plaintiff'that his liability on said obligation was not to be otherwise than that on the said original contract evidencing…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Scharfenburg v. Town of New DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Kelly's Heirs v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  3. Alabama National Bank v. HalseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Briel v. Exchange Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Eslava v. CramptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API