Legal Opinion

Bynum v. Southern Building & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 8, 1931No. 6 Div. 899PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant on the common counts for money had and received, and recovered a judgment, which was set aside by the court on defendant’s motion for new trial. From the order granting the motion for a new trial, plaintiff has prosecuted this appeal.

The action is founded upon the doctrine of rescission (Day v. Broyles, 222 Ala. 508, 133 So. 269), which in turn, in this particular instance, is rested upon alleged fraudulent representations of defendant’s agents in the sale of certain stock of defendant corporation closely akin to the fraud charged in the recent case of Southern…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Cartwright v. BralySupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Fairbanks Morse & Co. v. DeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Young v. Arntze & Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. Birmingham News Co. v. LesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. DinsmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Butler v. Guaranty Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Bankers' Mortg. Bond Co. v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Jackson v. RoddySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API