Legal Opinion

J. F. Morgan Paving Co. v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 7, 1924No. 6 Div. 819PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The existence of the debt sued upon, the amount thereof, and that it was past due when suit brought, are admitted facts.

The defense was that the debt was extinguished by payment, accord and satisfaction, or novation.

The court below gave the general affirmative .charge for plaintiff. The propriety of this instruction is the sole question here presented.

J. P. Morgan Paving Company, the defendant, was a road contractor, constructing a road under contract with the board of revenue of Jefferson county. J. L. Carroll, plaintiff, was a subcontractor of defendant. The debt accrued to plaintiff…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keel v. LarkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Lowenstein & Bros. v. BreslerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Hopkins v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Harrison v. HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1835
  5. Smith v. ElrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re All Media Properties, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
  2. Alexiou v. Bridgeport-Peoples' Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. A. M. Robinson Co. v. Anniston Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Crutchfield v. Johnson & LatimerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Wadsworth v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API