Legal Opinion

Green v. Nabors

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 5, 1931No. 6 Div. 842PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The suit is upon a note executed by defendant in the sum of $225, bearing date Ad-gust 30, 1928, and due November 28th following, payable to Woodlawn Savings Bank, the affairs of which are being administered by the state superintendent of banks.

The defense, was payment by the execution of a renewal note. “It is the settled doctrine in this state that, when a debtor gives his own security of no higher nature "for a pre-existing debt, it is considered, in the absence of an agreement, express or implied, as collateral or additional security, dr a conditional payment, which does not operate an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Keel v. LarkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Montgomery Bank & Trust Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. J. F. Morgan Paving Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Anniston Loan & Trust Co. v. StickneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Lee v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. White v. First Nat. Bank of OppSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Donovan v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API