Legal Opinion

MacEwan v. HOLM

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1961PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Plaintiff brings this suit to require the defendants, who constitute the State Board of Health, to make available to the plaintiff data requested by him relating to nuclear radiation sources which defendants had collected in the course of carrying out their duties under ORS eh 453. Plaintiff appeals from a decree granting defendants’ motion to dismiss.

Under ORS eh 453 enacted in 1957, the State Board of Health is charged with the duty of making a two-year study relating to radiation sources, after which *30it is required to “promulgate regulations and standards, in conformance with the policy…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Wiley v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Mathews v. PyleArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Nowack v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Youmans v. OwensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Newsome v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. Sadler v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Howard v. Des Moines Register & Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API