Legal Opinion
Perera v. Flexonics, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 25, 1989No. 89 C 2683PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Christine Perera has brought this employment discrimination action against her former employer, Flexonics, Inc., and six individual defendants. Currently before the Court is each defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment. Flexonics also has moved for sanctions under F.R.Civ.P. 11. For the reasons given below, we grant the motions of Perkins, Cudworth and Burkart and grant the motions of Flexonics, Marvel and Klinger in part.
Background
Christine Perera was employed by Flexonics in its Bartlett facility. On March 12, 1987, Perera…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mrs. Roger McMillan REEB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY ATLANTA, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- 13 Fair empl.prac.cas. 52, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,103 Beverly Jeanne Jenkins v. Blue Cross Mutual Hospital Insurance, Inc., and Blue Shield Mutual Medicalinsurance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Beard v. Whitley County REMCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allen v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Bright v. Roadway Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Huff v. UARCO, INC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Gehrt v. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Cooperative Extension ServiceDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1997
- Doyle v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.