Legal Opinion
Huff v. UARCO, INC.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 13, 1996No. 94 C 7585PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Jimmie Huff (“Huff’) has sued UARCO, Inc. (“UARCO”), charging it with age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA,” 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)) (Count I) and the Illinois Human Rights Act (“IHRA”), 775 ILCS 5/1-101 to 5/10-103 (Count II). 1 UARCO has moved for summary judgment under Fed. R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56, both sides have complied with this District Court’s General Rule (“GR”) 12(M) and 12(N) and the motion is fully briefed and ready for decision. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sedrak v. CallahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Jimmie Huff v. Uarco, Incorporated, William M. Schoolman v. Uarco, Incorporated, and the Trustees of the Uarco Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Cavalieri-Conway v. L. Butterman & AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Koulegeorge v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Jones v. General Electric Information ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.