Northern Oil & Gas Co. v. Birkeland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 203 N.W. 228, 205 N.W. 449, 206 N.W. 380. On April 9, 1925, the following opinion was filed: Motion to dismiss the appeal of the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendants.
1. One ground of the motion is that the bond and fee on appeal were not filed within the time fixed by the statute.
The statute requires that an appeal shall be made by the service of the notice on the adverse party and on the clerk. To make it effective the party appealing must file the notice and bond on appeal with the clerk of the court below and pay the appeal fee within the time provided, which,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. SueySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Wheeler v. CraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Baxter v. Orinoco Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Baxter v. Orinoco Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Northern Oil & Gas Co. v. BirkelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Diedrick v. HelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Dempsey v. MeighenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Ullman v. LutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Bondy v. RybergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Anderson v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988