UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY v. Pacific Award Metals, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE NON-INFRINGEMENT
WHITE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff United States Gypsum Company (“USG”). Having considered the parties’ pleadings, relevant legal authority, and having had the benefit of oral argument, the Court HEREBY GRANTS USG’s motion.
In its motion, USG argues that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the false marking counterclaim filed by Defendant Pacific Award Metals, Inc. (“Award”) with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Freeman v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schultz ex rel. Morris v. Wells Fargo BankDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Norix Group, Inc. v. Correctional Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Cortech USADistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Tyco Healthcare Group, LP v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Tyco Healthcare Group, Lp v. Cr Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011