Fox v. Planning Board of Milton
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
The plaintiff (Fox) owns a parcel of land in Milton that abuts the land taken by the Metropolitan Park Commission in 1904 to construct the Neponset Valley Parkway. Proposing to divide the parcel into four lots, each with the frontage required by the Milton zoning by-law (150 feet) on the parkway land, Fox submitted a plan to the planning board for endorsement under G. L. c. 41, § 81P, that approval was not required. The plan shows that the four lots are separated from the paved portion of the parkway by approximately 175 feet, the average width at that point of a green belt that borders the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anzalone v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Gifford v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Perry v. Planning Board of NantucketMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Burke v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Hrenchuk v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sturdy v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Corcoran v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Gates v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Cricones v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Poulos v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.