Legal Opinion

Poulos v. Planning Board

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 13, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

The plaintiff owns a parcel of land on Liberty Street, a forty foot wide paved public way, in the town of Braintree. He proposes to divide his property into twelve lots, each of which contains at least fifty feet of frontage on Liberty Street as required by Braintree’s zoning by-law. General Laws c. 41, § 810 (1990 ed.), provides that no one may subdivide land in a town in which the subdivision control law, G. L. c. 41, §§ 81K-81GG (1990 ed.), is in effect, as it is in Braintree, without first submitting a plan of the *360proposed subdivision to the town’s planning board for its approval, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anzalone v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Gifford v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Perry v. Planning Board of NantucketMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. Corcoran v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Fox v. Planning Board of MiltonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gates v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  2. Hamilton v. Planning Board of BeverlyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  3. Hobbs Brook Farm Property Co. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  4. Anderson v. Lam Builders, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2005
  5. Titus v. Planning Board of GloucesterMassachusetts Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API