Hrenchuk v. Planning Board
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The trial judge was not in error in dismissing the plaintiff’s appeal from the defendant’s refusal to endorse his plan as not requiring its approval as a subdivision under G. L. c. 41, § 81P, as appearing in St. 1963, c. 363, § 1.
Although all the lots within the tract abut a public way, that way, Interstate Highway 95, is a limited-access highway, and the boundaries of the plaintiff’s proposed lots thereon provide no means of vehicular passage between the highway and any of the lots. They can be reached only by use of a thirty-foot wide private way leading to a full-access public way upon…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gifford v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
3Cited by16 opinions
- Perry v. Planning Board of NantucketMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Sturdy v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Corcoran v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Fox v. Planning Board of MiltonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Gates v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.