Corcoran v. Planning Board
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
The planning board of Sudbury (board) appealed from a decision of the Land Court that the plaintiff *249landowners were entitled to an “approval under the subdivision control law not required” endorsement (hereafter “ANR” endorsement) on a plan of land in Sudbury. The Appeals Court reversed and upheld the denial of the “ANR” endorsement by the board. 26 Mass. App. Ct. 1000 (1988). We granted the plaintiffs’ application for further appellate review and now affirm the judgment of the Land Court.
There is no material dispute concerning the facts. The plaintiffs hold title to a parcel of land in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gifford v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Rettig v. Planning Board of RowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Perry v. Planning Board of NantucketMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Hrenchuk v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Gallitano v. BD. OF SURVEY PLANNING OF WALTHAMMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sturdy v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Gates v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Palitz v. Zoning Board of Appeals of TisburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Cricones v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Poulos v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.