Legal Opinion
Yale & Towne Mfg. Co. v. Manning, Maxwell & Moore, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 29, 1950PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved to enjoin the defendant from proceeding further with prosecution of an action in the United Stated District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division, designated Civil Action 1424, wherein the defendant is the plaintiff, and Hayden Supply Company, a Michigan corporation, is defendant, on the ground that the contested issues between the real parties in interest in both actions can be completely disposed of in the present action and cannot be completely disposed of in said Michigan action.
This action is for a declaratory…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Cresta Blanca Wine Co. v. Eastern Wine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. National Electric Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Chandler & Price Co. v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Leonard R. Kahn v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Stewart-Warner Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and Canadian Westinghousecompany, Ltd., Intervenor-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. Spunize Co. Of America, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Ruddies v. Auburn Spark Plug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.