Legal Opinion
Chandler & Price Co. v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 11, 1935No. 11PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc., brought this suit in the District Court for Eastern New York against Joseph Freeman, Inc. The bill alleges that plaintiff is the owner of patent No. 1,363,200 for “ Improvements in Automatic Feed and Delivery for Platen Presses,” that defendant is using an infringing printing press, and prays injunction and accounting. Before answer by defendant, the Chandler & Price Company applied to the court for leave to intervene as a party defendant. The substance of the facts it alleges in order to show that it has an interest in the litigation (Equity Rule 37) is as follows:…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. United States & Mexican Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Toler v. East Tennessee, V. & G. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1894
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Powell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Stewart-Warner Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and Canadian Westinghousecompany, Ltd., Intervenor-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Farmers Mutuals Automobile Insurance v. WeberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Switzer Bros., Inc. v. LocklinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Pitman v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.