Legal Opinion
Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. Spunize Co. Of America, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 1, 1959No. 310, Docket 25519PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by defendant, hereafter called Spunize, from an order entered in a declaratory judgment action wherein the plaintiff, hereafter called Bancroft, sought an adjudication that Patent No. 2,715,309 owned by Spunize is invalid. The patent contains only a single claim. This is for a product, namely, a yarn of synthetic resin material whose filaments are crimped in a particular manner. 1 The complaint, filed August 1, 1958, alleges that Bancroft owns or controls numerous patents relating to method and apparatus for the crimping of filament yarn; that it has made…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- AEP Energy Services Gas Holding Co. v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- William Gluckin & Co., Inc. v. International Playtex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Leonard R. Kahn v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. A. L. Fowler, D. O. Thomas, and E. O. Thomas, Individually and Doing Business as Fowler Poultry & Egg Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Paul A. Muller and Celfil Company Establishment v. Olin Mathieson Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.