Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pomeroy v. Webber

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1965No. 38920PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Section 2321.07, Revised Code, provides:

“The trial judge, upon the receipt of a bill of exceptions, shall indorse thereon the date it was received, and within five days thereafter correct it, if necessary, allow and sign such bill, and immediately transmit it to the office of the clerk of the court from whom it was received, with any amendment or objections thereto.”

Under such section, a mandatory duty is imposed on a trial judge to “allow and sign” a true bill.

“It is the duty of the trial judge to allow and sign a bill of exceptions when duly presented, if the same be correct; it is likewise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kobelt v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Hartford Fire Ins. v. WeygandtOhio Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Feliciano v. KreigerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. S & M Constructors, Inc. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State ex rel. Durkin v. City Council of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API