Legal Opinion
Cravens v. Hughes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 12, 1952No. 35069PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neal, J.
The amended petition, upon which issues were joined, substantially alleges that plaintiff is a duly licensed and practicing civil engineer; that the defendants are the owners of 61 acres of unimproved prairie land, adjacent to the town of Nichols Hills, west of May avenue, near 70th street, north of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and that adjacent lands had been improved for residential purposes. That in May, 1946, defendants employed plaintiff to survey, lay off and plat and to prepare a plat and plan for recording into an addition to be known as Wilshire Boulevard addition. The defendants agreed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lumbermen's Supply Co. v. NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Gasper v. MayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Mead v. HellamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- McGill v. Cooper Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Cole v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walker v. Telex Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Harris v. ConwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Marten v. Credit Adjustment Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- State ex rel. Department of Highways v. BurdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Keispert v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.