Legal Opinion

Cole v. Harvey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 28, 1948No. 32901PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Plaintiff, S. D. Harvey, commenced an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for work performed on the property of defendant, A. R. Cole, and sought to recover $91.35. The cause was submitted to the jury upon the question of amount due and verdict was returned for the plaintiff in the sum of $40. An attorney’s fee was thereupon fixed under the law providing for such fee in foreclosure of a ,lien, judgment was entered upon the verdict, and the defendant, after motion for new trial was overruled, appealed to this court.

If is first argued that there is no competent evidence reasonably tending to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mullen v. ThaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Thorp Oil & Specialty Co. v. Home Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Lumbermen's Supply Co. v. NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Freeman v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Gasper v. MayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Whitehorse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Harris v. ConwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Cravens v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Danner v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Marten v. Credit Adjustment Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API