Legal Opinion

Barth v. De Coursey

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1949No. 7529PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Justice.

Plaintiff owns a recreation area on the north side of Snake River in Canyon County near Walter’s Ferry Bridge on the road from Melba to Murphy. On February 4,, 1949, he filed application with the Board of County Commissioners of Canyon County for a license to sell beer thereat. His application was on forms furnished by the County. It appeared on the face of the application that the applicant possessed all the qualifications and none of the disqualifications, prescribed by state law, of a licensee.

Plaintiff’s application for a license was refused on the sole ground that the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Mernaugh v. City of OrlandoSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  4. State Ex Rel. Thornbury v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. City of Fairfield v. PappasIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Mickelsen v. City of RexburgIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Clyde Hess Distributing Co. v. Bonneville CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Gartland v. TalbottIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Winther v. Village of WeippeIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API