Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Thornbury v. Gregory
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1937No. 26705. En BancPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
— Plaintiff, R. E. Thornbury, operates a restaurant in the city of Olympia and has been licensed by the Washington state liquor board (hereinafter referred to as the Board) to-sell wines and beer. Under authority of Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 7306-79 [P. C. § 3180-89] (Washington state liquor act, Laws 1933, Ex. Ses., chapter 62, p. 173, § 79), the Board promulgated certain regulations, by one of which the sale of beer and wine by a licensee was prohibited from midnight Saturday of each week to six o’clock on the following Mondqy morning.
Mr. Thornbury filed in the superior court for Thurs-ton…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- New York Ex Rel. Lieberman v. Van De CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- State Ex Rel. State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Gottstein v. ListerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Ajax v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hart v. ParhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Hi-Starr, Inc. v. Liquor Control BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Randles v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Anderson, Leech & Morse, Inc. v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- The Squaxin Island Tribe v. The State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.