Legal Opinion
In Re Lindsay
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided November 27, 1935No. 2985PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, District Judge.
The controversy here presented is between a farmer debtor under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended by the Act approved August 28, 1935, com monly referred to as the second FrazierLemke Act (11 USCA § 203 (g, k, n, p, and s), and the holder of a mortgage in course of foreclosure on the debtor’s farm. On November 7, 1934, William Francis Lindsay, the debtor, filed his petition and schedules under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, scheduling as his sole asset a 270-acre farm of a scheduled estimated value of $24,000. The debtor schedules as incumbrance on said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States Nat. Bank of Omaha, Neb. v. PampCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- In Re SchaefferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
- In Re SchoenleberDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1936
- In Re DillerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1935
- Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.