Legal Opinion
In Re Diller
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 13, 1935No. 23967-CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COSGRAVE, District Judge.
William Diller, stating that he was a farmer, filed his petition on September 14, 1934, under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended by Acts June 7, June 28, 1934, 48 Stat. 925, 1289, and prayed proceedings in accordance therewith.
After various proceedings under sections 75 and 75 (s), as existing originally, that need not be described in this memorandum, he has secured adjudication under section 75 (s) as it now exists (Bankruptcy Act, § 75 (s), 11 U.S.C.A. § 203 (s), approved August 28, 1935)'.
A petition to dismiss the debtor’s proceeding, or in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Sacramento Bank v. AlcornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- In Re YoungDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1935
- In Re ShermanDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1935
- In Re SlaughterDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re SchaefferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
- In Re CarterDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1944
- Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- In re MahaffeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- In re PaulDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.