Legal Opinion

Rino Gnesi Co. v. Sbriglio

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 6, 2004No. AC 23735PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

The defendants, Sebastian Sbriglio, Angela Sbriglio and Ann M. Sbriglio, appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion to open the judgment rendered after they were defaulted for failure to plead and after their counsel failed to appear at the hearing in damages. The sole issue on appeal is whether the court abused its discretion in denying the motion to open. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*709Notwithstanding the defendants’ efforts to obfuscate this matter by reciting a litany of details unrelated to the present appeal, the pertinent facts are rather…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. Gagne v. VaccaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Woodruff v. RileyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. State v. Ritz Realty Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Carr v. Fleet BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rowe v. GouletConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. State v. WahabConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Eremita v. MorelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Bank of New York Mellon v. HorseyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. State v. BegleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API