Legal Opinion

Blakely v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 26, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Petitioners are 28 individuals who have been convicted of the crime of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. ORS 167.210. Twenty-five have petitioned for post-conviction relief, ORS 138.510 et seq, on the ground that the portion of the statute under which they were convicted, ORS 167.210, was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in State v. Hodges, 254 Or 21, 457 P2d 491 (1969).

The other three petitioners were convicted under a different portion of ORS 167.210. These three contend that they are entitled to the same relief because the reasoning in Hodges which led to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Coon v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stewart v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Coon v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API