Legal Opinion

State v. Hammond

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 20, 1978No. 83939, 83941, 83942, CA 9608, 9609, 9610PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant brought these three consolidated proceedings seeking to have his criminal and arrest records expunged pursuant to ORS 137.225. He appeals from the denial by the circuit court of his motion for relief. We conclude that the circuit court erred in denying relief.

The sequence of events is as follows:

In 1967 defendant was charged in three indictments with violations of former ORS 167.210 2 by "wilfully and lewdly fondl[ing] and manipulating] the private parts” of three named victims who were 12 years old or younger. He pleaded guilty to all three charges and was sentenced to five years…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Blakely v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LanganOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. BranamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Springer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. State v. GwytherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API