Legal Opinion

Coon v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 26, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Petitioners were convicted of the crime of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. ORS 167.210. Their rights of appeal were exhausted prior to the date of State v. Hodges, 254 Or 21, 457 P2d 491 (1969), which declared a portion of ORS 167.210 unconstitutionally vague. ORS 167.210 reads:

“When a child is a delinquent child as defined by any statute of this state, [1] any person responsible for, or by any act encouraging, causing or contributing to the' delinquency of such child, [2] or any person who by .threats, command or persuasion, endeavors to induce any child, to perform any act or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Blakely v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SamterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. Blakely v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. State v. VachonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  5. State v. VachonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API