Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1973PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

Recently the United States Supreme Court held the practice of plea bargaining to be an “essential” and “desirable” part of the administration of criminal justice when “properly administered.” Santobello v. New York, 404 US 257, 92 S Ct 495, 30 L Ed 2d 427, 432 (1971). One element of proper administration is:

“* * * [W]hen a plea [of guilty] rests in any significant degree on a promise or agreement of the prosecutor, so that it can be said to be part of the inducement or consideration, such promise must be fulfilled.” Santobello v. New York, supra, 404 US at 262.

Petitioner’s appeal in this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. FairOregon Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. DeBolt v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Stone v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API