Legal Opinion
Eaton v. Supreme Court of Arkansas
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 6, 1980No. 80-4PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
Petitioners, attorneys practicing law in North little Rock, appeal from the decision of the respondents’ issuance of a private reprimand as a result of the attorneys’ actions in advertising their firm.
In March, 1979, the petitioners contracted with Val-Pak Advertising to include an advertisement of their firm in a mail-out packet with other advertisements to a target area of 10,000 households in the North Little Rock area. Their advertisements was so mailed in June. Petitioners subsequently received a letter from the respondent Committee advising a complaint had been made…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In Re PrimusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Weems v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. StuartKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- James A. Neal v. Jimmie L. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- In re GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Missouri Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- In Re Utah State Bar Petition for Approval of Changes in Disciplinary Rules on AdvertisingUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Neal v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.